Paper detail

Combined Pruning for Nested Cross-Validation to Accelerate Automated Hyperparameter Optimization for Embedded Feature Selection in High-Dimensional Data with Very Small Sample Sizes

Background: Embedded feature selection in high-dimensional data with very small sample sizes requires optimized hyperparameters for the model building process. For this hyperparameter optimization, nested cross-validation must be applied to avoid a biased performance estimation. The resulting repeated training with high-dimensional data leads to very long computation times. Moreover, it is likely to observe a high variance in the individual performance evaluation metrics caused by outliers in tiny validation sets. Therefore, early stopping applying standard pruning algorithms to save time risks discarding promising hyperparameter sets. Result: To speed up feature selection for high-dimensional data with tiny sample size, we adapt the use of a state-of-the-art asynchronous successive halving pruner. In addition, we combine it with two complementary pruning strategies based on domain or prior knowledge. One pruning strategy immediately stops computing trials with semantically meaningless results for the selected hyperparameter combinations. The other is a new extrapolating threshold pruning strategy suitable for nested-cross-validation with a high variance of performance evaluation metrics. In repeated experiments, our combined pruning strategy keeps all promising trials. At the same time, the calculation time is substantially reduced compared to using a state-of-the-art asynchronous successive halving pruner alone. Up to 81.3\% fewer models were trained achieving the same optimization result. Conclusion: The proposed combined pruning strategy accelerates data analysis or enables deeper searches for hyperparameters within the same computation time. This leads to significant savings in time, money and energy consumption, opening the door to advanced, time-consuming analyses.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.