Paper detail

Combinatorial topology of the standard chromatic subdivision and Weak Symmetry Breaking for 6 processes

In this paper we study a family of discrete configuration spaces, the so-called protocol complexes, which are of utmost importance in theoretical distributed computing. Specifically, we consider questions of the existance of compliant binary labelings on the vertices of iterated standard chromatic subdivisions of an n-simplex. The existance of such labelings is equivalent to the existance of distributed protocols solving Weak Symmetry Breaking task in the standard computational model. As a part of our formal model, we introduce function sb(n), defined for natural numbers n, called the symmetry breaking function. From the geometric point of view sb(n) denotes the minimal number of iterations of the standard chromatic subdivision of an (n-1)-simplex, which is needed for the compliant binary labeling to exist. From the point of distributed computing, the function sb(n) measures the minimal number of rounds in a protocol solving the Weak Symmetry Breaking task. In addition to the development of combinatorial topology, which is applicable in a broader context, our main contribution is the proof of new bounds for the function sb(n). Accordingly, the bulk of the paper is taken up by in-depth analysis of the structure of adjacency graph on the set of n-simplices in iterated standard chromatic subdivision of an n-simplex. On the algorithmic side, we provide the first distributed protocol solving Weak Symmetry Breaking task in the layered immediate snapshot computational model for some number of processes. It is well known, that the smallest number of processes for which Weak Symmetry Breaking task is solvable is 6. Based on our analysis, we are able to find a very fast explicit protocol, solving the Weak Symmetry Breaking for 6 processes using only 3 rounds. Furthermore, we show that no protocol can solve Weak Symmetry Breaking in fewer than 2 rounds.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.