Paper detail

Combinatorial results implied by many zero divisors in a group ring

It has been recently proved (by Croot, Lev and Pach and the subsequent work by Ellenberg and Gijswijt) that for a group $G=G_0^n$, where $G_0\ne \{1,-1\}^m$ is a fixed finite Abelian group and $n$ is large, any subset $A$ without 3-progressions (triples $x,y,z$ of different elements with $xy=z^2$) contains at most $|G|^{1-c}$ elements, where $c>0$ is a constant depending only on $G_0$. This is known to be false when $G$ is, say, large cyclic group. The aim of this note is to show that algebraic property which corresponds to this difference is the following: in the first case a group algebra $\mathbb{F}[G]$ over suitable field $\mathbb{F}$ contains a subspace $X$ with codimension at most $|X|^{1-c}$ such that $X^3=0$. We discuss which bounds are obtained for finite Abelian $p$-groups and for some matrix $p$-groups: Heisenberg group over $\mathbb{F}_p$ and the unitriangular group over $\mathbb{F}_p$. Also we show how the method works for further generalizations by Kleinberg--Sawin--Speyer and Ellenberg.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.