Paper detail

Combinatorial Geometry of Graph Partitioning - I

The {\sc $c$-Balanced Separator} problem is a graph-partitioning problem in which given a graph $G$, one aims to find a cut of minimum size such that both the sides of the cut have at least $cn$ vertices. In this paper, we present new directions of progress in the {\sc $c$-Balanced Separator} problem. More specifically, we propose a family of mathematical programs, that depend upon a parameter $p > 0$, and is an extension of the uniform version of the SDPs proposed by Goemans and Linial for this problem. In fact for the case, when $p=1$, if one can solve this program in polynomial time then simply using the Goemans-Williamson's randomized rounding algorithm for {\sc Max Cut} \cite{WG95} will give an $O(1)$-factor approximation algorithm for {\sc $c$-Balanced Separator} improving the best known approximation factor of $O(\sqrt{\log n})$ due to Arora, Rao and Vazirani \cite{ARV}. This family of programs is not convex but one can transform them into so called \emph{\textbf{concave programs}} in which one optimizes a concave function over a convex feasible set. It is well known that the optima of such programs lie at one of the extreme points of the feasible set \cite{TTT85}. Our main contribution is a combinatorial characterization of some extreme points of the feasible set of the mathematical program, for $p=1$ case, which to the best of our knowledge is the first of its kind. We further demonstrate how this characterization can be used to solve the program in a restricted setting. Non-convex programs have recently been investigated by Bhaskara and Vijayaraghvan \cite{BV11} in which they design algorithms for approximating Matrix $p$-norms although their algorithmic techniques are analytical in nature.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.