Paper detail

Combable functions, quasimorphisms, and the central limit theorem

A function on a discrete group is weakly combable if its discrete derivative with respect to a combing can be calculated by a finite state automaton. A weakly combable function is bicombable if it is Lipschitz in both the left and right invariant word metrics. Examples of bicombable functions on word-hyperbolic groups include (i) homomorphisms to Z (ii) word length with respect to a finite generating set (iii) most known explicit constructions of quasimorphisms (e.g. the Epstein-Fujiwara counting quasimorphisms) We show that bicombable functions on word-hyperbolic groups satisfy a central limit theorem: if \barϕ_n is the value of ϕon a random element of word length n (in a certain sense), there are E and σfor which there is convergence in the sense of distribution n^{-1/2}(\barϕ_n - nE) \to N(0,σ), where N(0,σ) denotes the normal distribution with standard deviation σ. As a corollary, we show that if S_1 and S_2 are any two finite generating sets for G, there is an algebraic number lambda_{1,2} depending on S_1 and S_2 such that almost every word of length n in the S_1 metric has word length nλ_{1,2} in the S_2 metric, with error of size O(\sqrt{n}).

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.