Paper detail

Collective flows of protons and deuterons in Au + Au collisions at $E_{beam}$ = 1.23$A$ GeV by the IQMD model

Collective flows of protons and deuterons for Au + Au collisions at beam energy $E_{beam}$ = 1.23 $A$ GeV were simulated by an Isospin dependent Quantum Molecular Dynamics (IQMD) model. Two coalescence models, namely naive coalescence and dynamical coalescence models, for the formation of deuterons are compared. After reasonable match of rapidity spectra of protons and deuterons to the High Acceptance DiElectron Spectrometer (HADES) data is reached, we apply an event-plane method to calculate the first four-order collective flow coefficients as well as the ratios of $<v_4>/<v_2>^2$ and $<v_3>/<v_1><v_2>$, and observe the number of constituent nucleon scaling among protons and deuterons. In addition, the dependence of $ε_n$ and $v_n$ as well as the ratio $<v_n>$/$ε_n$ on the centrality is obtained. Lastly, we further investigate the Pearson coefficients $corr(v_n,v_m)$ between the first four harmonic flows for protons and deuterons as a function of rapidity and centrality.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.