Paper detail

Collaborative Receptive Field Learning

The challenge of object categorization in images is largely due to arbitrary translations and scales of the foreground objects. To attack this difficulty, we propose a new approach called collaborative receptive field learning to extract specific receptive fields (RF's) or regions from multiple images, and the selected RF's are supposed to focus on the foreground objects of a common category. To this end, we solve the problem by maximizing a submodular function over a similarity graph constructed by a pool of RF candidates. However, measuring pairwise distance of RF's for building the similarity graph is a nontrivial problem. Hence, we introduce a similarity metric called pyramid-error distance (PED) to measure their pairwise distances through summing up pyramid-like matching errors over a set of low-level features. Besides, in consistent with the proposed PED, we construct a simple nonparametric classifier for classification. Experimental results show that our method effectively discovers the foreground objects in images, and improves classification performance.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.