Paper detail

Collaborative High Accuracy Localization in Mobile Multipath Environments

We study the problem of high accuracy localization of mobile nodes in a multipath-rich environment where sub-meter accuracies are required. We employ a peer-to-peer framework where the vehicles/nodes can get pairwise multipath-degraded ranging estimates in local neighborhoods together with a fixed number of anchor nodes. The challenge is to overcome the multipath-barrier with redundancy in order to provide the desired accuracies especially under severe multipath conditions when the fraction of received signals corrupted by multipath is dominating. We invoke a analytical graphical model framework based on particle filtering and reveal its high accuracy localization promise through simulations. We also address design questions such as "How many anchors and what fraction of line-of-sight (LOS) measurements are needed to achieve a specified target accuracy?", by analytically characterizing the performance improvement in localization accuracy as a function of the number of nodes in the network and the fraction of LOS measurements. In particular, for a static node placement, we show that the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB), a fundamental lower bound on the localization accuracy, can be expressed as a product of two factors - a scalar function that depends only on the parameters of the noise distribution and a matrix that depends only on the geometry of node locations and the underlying connectivity graph. Further, a simplified expression is obtained for the CRLB that helps deduce the scaling behavior of the estimation error as a function of the number of agents and anchors in the network. The bound suggests that even a small fraction of LOS measurements can provide significant improvements. Conversely, a small fraction of NLOS measurements can significantly degrade the performance. The analysis is extended to the mobile setting and the performance is compared with the derived CRLB.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.