Paper detail

Coherent noise source identification in multi channel analysis

The evaluation of coherent noise can provide useful information in the study of detectors. The identification of coherent noise sources is also relevant for uncertainty calculations in analyse where several channels are combined. The study of the covariance matrix give information about coherent noises. Since covariance matrix of high dimension data could be difficult to analyse, the development of analysis tools is needed. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a powerful tool for such analysis. It has been shown that we can use PCA to find coherent noises in ATLAS calorimeter or the CALICE Si-W electromagnetic calorimeter physics prototype. However, if several coherent noise sources are combined, the interpretation of the PCA may become complicated. In this paper, we present another method based on the study of the covariance matrix to identify noise sources. This method has been developed for the study of front end ASICs dedicated to CALICE calorimeters. These calorimeters are designed and studied for experiments at the ILC. We also study the reliability of the method with simulations. Although this method has been developped for a specific application, it can be used for any multi channel analysis.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.