Paper detail

Coexistence of phases and the observability of random graphs

In a recent Letter, Yang et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 258701 (2012)] introduced the concept of observability transitions: the percolation-like emergence of a macroscopic observable component in graphs in which the state of a fraction of the nodes, and of their first neighbors, is monitored. We show how their concept of depth-L percolation---where the state of nodes up to a distance L of monitored nodes is known---can be mapped unto multitype random graphs, and use this mapping to exactly solve the observability problem for arbitrary L. We then demonstrate a non-trivial coexistence of an observable and of a non-observable extensive component. This coexistence suggests that monitoring a macroscopic portion of a graph does not prevent a macroscopic event to occur unbeknown to the observer. We also show that real complex systems behave quite differently with regard to observability depending on whether they are geographically-constrained or not.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.