Paper detail

Coefficient of performance under maximum $χ$ criterion in a two-level atomic system as a refrigerator

A two-level atomic system as a working substance is used to set up a refrigerator consisting of two quantum adiabatic and two isochoric processes (two constant-frequency processes $ω_a$ and $ω_b$ with $ω_a<ω_b$), during which the two-level system is in contact with two heat reservoirs at temperatures $T_h$ and $T_c (<T_h)$. Considering finite-time operation of two isochoric processes, we derive analytical expressions for cooling rate $R$ and coefficient of performance (COP) $\varepsilon$. The COP at maximum $χ(= \varepsilon R)$ figure of merit is numerically determined, and it is proved to be in nice agreement with the so-called Curzon and Ahlborn COP $\varepsilon_{CA}=\sqrt{1+\varepsilon_C}-1$, where $\varepsilon_C=T_c/(T_h-T_c)$ is the Carnot COP. In the high-temperature limit, the COP at maximum $χ$ figure of merit, $\varepsilon^*$, can be expressed analytically by $\varepsilon^* = \varepsilon_+ \equiv (\sqrt{9+8\varepsilon_C}-3)/2$, which was derived previously as the upper bound of optimal COP for the low-dissipation or minimally nonlinear irreversible refrigerators. Within context of irreversible thermodynamics, we prove that the value of $\varepsilon_{+}$ is also the upper bound of COP at maximum $χ$ figure of merit when we regard our model as a linear irreversible refrigerator.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.