Paper detail

Codec Compression Efficiency Evaluation of MPEG-5 part 2 (LCEVC) using Objective and Subjective Quality Assessment

With the increasing advancements in video compression efficiency achieved by newer codecs such as HEVC, AV1, and VVC, and intelligent encoding strategies, as well as improved bandwidth availability,there has been a proliferation and acceptance of newer services such as Netflix, Twitch, etc. However, such higher compression efficiencies are achieved at the cost of higher complexity and encoding delay, while many applications are delay sensitive. Hence, there is a requirement for faster, more efficient codecs to achieve higher encoding efficiency without significant trade-off in terms of both complexity and speed. We present in this work an evaluation of the latest MPEG-5 Part 2 Low Complexity Enhancement Video Coding (LCEVC) for live gaming video streaming applications. The results are presented in terms of bitrate savings using both subjective and objective quality measures as well as a comparison of the encoding speeds. Our results indicate that, for the encoding settings used in this work, LCEVC outperforms both x264 and x265 codecs in terms of bitrate savings using VMAF by approximately 42\% and 38\%. Using subjective results, it is found that LCEVC outperforms the respective base codecs, especially for low bitrates. This effect is more evident for x264 than for x265, i.e., for the latter the absolute improvement of quality scores is smaller. The objective and subjective results as well as sample video sequences are made available as part of an open dataset, LCEVC-LiveGaming at https://github.com/NabajeetBarman/LCEVC-LiveGaming.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.