BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Nabajeet Barman

Nabajeet Barman contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Multimediaeess.IVeess.SPInformation Theorymath.ITNetworking and Internet Architecture

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Bjøntegaard Delta (BD): A Tutorial Overview of the Metric, Evolution, Challenges, and Recommendations

The Bjøntegaard Delta (BD) method proposed in 2001 has become a popular tool for comparing video codec compression efficiency. It was initially proposed to compute bitrate and quality differences between two Rate-Distortion curves using PSNR as a distortion metric. Over the years, many works have calculated and reported BD results using other objective quality metrics such as SSIM, VMAF and, in some cases, even subjective ratings (mean opinion scores). However, the lack of consolidated literature explaining the metric, its evolution over the years, and a systematic evaluation of the same under different test conditions can result in a wrong interpretation of the BD results thus obtained. Towards this end, this paper presents a detailed tutorial describing the BD method and example cases where the metric might fail. We also provide a detailed history of its evolution, including a discussion of various proposed improvements and variations over the last 20 years. In addition, we evaluate the various BD methods and their open-source implementations, considering different objective quality metrics and subjective ratings taking into account different RD characteristics. Based on our results, we present a set of recommendations on using existing BD metrics and various insights for possible exploration towards developing more effective tools for codec compression efficiency evaluation and comparison.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Codec Compression Efficiency Evaluation of MPEG-5 part 2 (LCEVC) using Objective and Subjective Quality Assessment

With the increasing advancements in video compression efficiency achieved by newer codecs such as HEVC, AV1, and VVC, and intelligent encoding strategies, as well as improved bandwidth availability,there has been a proliferation and acceptance of newer services such as Netflix, Twitch, etc. However, such higher compression efficiencies are achieved at the cost of higher complexity and encoding delay, while many applications are delay sensitive. Hence, there is a requirement for faster, more efficient codecs to achieve higher encoding efficiency without significant trade-off in terms of both complexity and speed. We present in this work an evaluation of the latest MPEG-5 Part 2 Low Complexity Enhancement Video Coding (LCEVC) for live gaming video streaming applications. The results are presented in terms of bitrate savings using both subjective and objective quality measures as well as a comparison of the encoding speeds. Our results indicate that, for the encoding settings used in this work, LCEVC outperforms both x264 and x265 codecs in terms of bitrate savings using VMAF by approximately 42\% and 38\%. Using subjective results, it is found that LCEVC outperforms the respective base codecs, especially for low bitrates. This effect is more evident for x264 than for x265, i.e., for the latter the absolute improvement of quality scores is smaller. The objective and subjective results as well as sample video sequences are made available as part of an open dataset, LCEVC-LiveGaming at https://github.com/NabajeetBarman/LCEVC-LiveGaming.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

User Generated HDR Gaming Video Streaming: Dataset, Codec Comparison and Challenges

Gaming video streaming services have grown tremendously in the past few years, with higher resolutions, higher frame rates and HDR gaming videos getting increasingly adopted among the gaming community. Since gaming content as such is different from non-gaming content, it is imperative to evaluate the performance of the existing encoders to help understand the bandwidth requirements of such services, as well as further improve the compression efficiency of such encoders. Towards this end, we present in this paper GamingHDRVideoSET, a dataset consisting of eighteen 10-bit UHD-HDR gaming videos and encoded video sequences using four different codecs, together with their objective evaluation results. The dataset is available online at [to be added after paper acceptance]. Additionally, the paper discusses the codec compression efficiency of most widely used practical encoders, i.e., x264 (H.264/AVC), x265 (H.265/HEVC) and libvpx (VP9), as well the recently proposed encoder libaom (AV1), on 10-bit, UHD-HDR content gaming content. Our results show that the latest compression standard AV1 results in the best compression efficiency, followed by HEVC, H.264, and VP9.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

QoE Management of Multimedia Streaming Services in Future Networks: A Tutorial and Survey

We provide in this paper a tutorial and a comprehensive survey of QoE management solutions in current and future networks. We start with a high level description of QoE management for multimedia services, which integrates QoE modelling, monitoring, and optimization. This followed by a discussion of HTTP Adaptive Streaming (HAS) solutions as the dominant technique for streaming videos over the best-effort Internet. We then summarize the key elements in SDN/NFV along with an overview of ongoing research projects, standardization activities and use cases related to SDN, NFV, and other emerging applications. We provide a survey of the state-of-the-art of QoE management techniques categorized into three different groups: a) QoE-aware/driven strategies using SDN and/or NFV; b) QoE-aware/driven approaches for adaptive streaming over emerging architectures such as multi-access edge computing, cloud/fog computing, and information-centric networking; and c) extended QoE management approaches in new domains such as immersive augmented and virtual reality, mulsemedia and video gaming applications. Based on the review, we present a list of identified future QoE management challenges regarding emerging multimedia applications, network management and orchestration, network slicing and collaborative service management in softwarized networks. Finally, we provide a discussion on future research directions with a focus on emerging research areas in QoE management, such as QoE-oriented business models, QoE-based big data strategies, and scalability issues in QoE optimization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access