Paper detail

Cob: a consensus layer enabling sustainable sharding-based consensus protocols

In this paper we explore a context of application of Cob, a recently introduced Byzantine Fault Tolerant consensus protocol. Cob proves to be a leaderless consensus protocol which carries out the consensus process in parallel on each component of a list of events to be observed and recorded. We show how Cob can be used to define a consensus layer for scalable and sustainable blockchains. This layer is used to design consensus protocols based on sharding as a mean to achieve scalability, and on the fragmentation of time in time-slots (which get assigned to nodes that are instructed to create new blocks) as a mean to reduce the amount of computation and communication necessary for the maintenance of the distributed ledger. We explain why Cob is a viable candidate to implement such consensus layer through the introduction of an auxiliary blockchain that we name Synchronization Chain.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.