Paper detail

Coarse-graining strategies in polymer solutions

We review a coarse-graining strategy (multiblob approach) for polymer solutions in which groups of monomers are mapped onto a single atom (a blob) and effective blob-blob interactions are obtained by requiring the coarse-grained model to reproduce some coarse-grained features of the zero-density isolated-chain structure. By tuning the level of coarse graining, i.e. the number of monomers to be mapped onto a single blob, the model should be adequate to explore the semidilute regime above the collapse transition, since in this case the monomer density is very small if chains are long enough. The implementation of these ideas has been previously based on a transferability hypothesis, which was not completely tested against full-monomer results (Pierleoni et al., J. Chem. Phys, 127, 171102 (2007)). We study different models proposed in the past and we compare their predictions to full-monomer results for the chain structure and the thermodynamics in the range of polymer volume fractions Φbetween 0 and 8. We find that the transferability assumption has a limited predictive power if a thermodynamically consistent model is required. We introduce a new tetramer model parametrized in such a way to reproduce not only zero-density intramolecular and intermolecular two-body probabilities, but also some intramolecular three-body and four-body distributions. We find that such a model correctly predicts three-chain effects, the structure and the thermodynamics up to Φ~ 2, a range considerably larger than that obtained with previous simpler models using zero-density potentials. Our results show the correctness of the ideas behind the multiblob approach but also that more work is needed to understand how to develop models with more effective monomers which would allow us to explore the semidilute regime at larger chain volume fractions.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.