Paper detail

Co-existence of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interactions in Mn$_3$Ga$ _{(1-x)} $Sn$_x$C

The magnetic properties of the Mn$_3$Ga$_{(1-x)}$Sn$_x$C, 0 $\le$ x $\le$ 1 antiperovskite compounds have been investigated in detail. Though all compounds of this series crystallize in a cubic structure, the Ga rich (x $\le$ 0.2) compounds transform, via a first order transformation, to an antiferromagnetic ground state and the Sn rich (x $\ge$ 0.8) compounds exhibit dominant ferromagnetic interactions at low temperature. In the intermediate range (0.4 $\le$ x $\le$ 0.7) co-existence of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interactions can be seen. The results have been explained to be due to growth of ferromagnetic sub-lattice at the expense of antiferromagnetic sub-lattice with increasing Sn concentration in Mn$_3$Ga$_{(1-x)}$Sn$_x$C. This growth occurs to a point where the first-order transition is altered from a ferromagnetic - antiferromagnetic type in Ga rich compounds to a paramagnetic - ferrimagnetic type in Mn$_3$SnC.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.