Paper detail

CNN-based Approaches For Cross-Subject Classification in Motor Imagery: From The State-of-The-Art to DynamicNet

Motor imagery (MI)-based brain-computer interface (BCI) systems are being increasingly employed to provide alternative means of communication and control for people suffering from neuro-motor impairments, with a special effort to bring these systems out of the controlled lab environments. Hence, accurately classifying MI from brain signals, e.g., from electroencephalography (EEG), is essential to obtain reliable BCI systems. However, MI classification is still a challenging task, because the signals are characterized by poor SNR, high intra-subject and cross-subject variability. Deep learning approaches have started to emerge as valid alternatives to standard machine learning techniques, e.g., filter bank common spatial pattern (FBCSP), to extract subject-independent features and to increase the cross-subject classification performance of MI BCI systems. In this paper, we first present a review of the most recent studies using deep learning for MI classification, with particular attention to their cross-subject performance. Second, we propose DynamicNet, a Python-based tool for quick and flexible implementations of deep learning models based on convolutional neural networks. We show-case the potentiality of DynamicNet by implementing EEGNet, a well-established architecture for effective EEG classification. Finally, we compare its performance with FBCSP in a 4-class MI classification over public datasets. To explore its cross-subject classification ability, we applied three different cross-validation schemes. From our results, we demonstrate that DynamicNet-implemented EEGNet outperforms FBCSP by about 25%, with a statistically significant difference when cross-subject validation schemes are applied.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.