Paper detail

CNAK : Cluster Number Assisted K-means

Determining the number of clusters present in a dataset is an important problem in cluster analysis. Conventional clustering techniques generally assume this parameter to be provided up front. %user supplied. %Recently, robustness of any given clustering algorithm is analyzed to measure cluster stability/instability which in turn determines the cluster number. In this paper, we propose a method which analyzes cluster stability for predicting the cluster number. Under the same computational framework, the technique also finds representatives of the clusters. The method is apt for handling big data, as we design the algorithm using \emph{Monte-Carlo} simulation. Also, we explore a few pertinent issues found to be of also clustering. Experiments reveal that the proposed method is capable of identifying a single cluster. It is robust in handling high dimensional dataset and performs reasonably well over datasets having cluster imbalance. Moreover, it can indicate cluster hierarchy, if present. Overall we have observed significant improvement in speed and quality for predicting cluster numbers as well as the composition of clusters in a large dataset.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.