Paper detail

Clusters in the Disperse cosmic web

Galaxy cluster mass halos ("clusters") in a dark matter simulation are matched to nodes in several different cosmic webs found using the Disperse cosmic web finder. The webs have different simulation smoothings and Disperse parameter choices; for each, 4 methods are considered for matching Disperse nodes to clusters. For most of the webs, Disperse nodes outnumber clusters, but not every cluster has a Disperse node match (and sometimes $>1$ cluster matches to the same Disperse node). The clusters frequently lacking a matching Disperse node have a different distribution of local shear trends and perhaps merger histories. It might be interesting to see in what other ways, e.g., observational properties, these clusters differ. For the webs with smoothing $\leq$ 2.5 $Mpc/h$, and all but the most restrictive matching criterion, $\sim$3/4 of the clusters always have a Disperse node counterpart. The nearest cluster to a given Disperse node and vice versa, within twice the smoothing length, obey a cluster mass-Disperse node density relation. Cluster pairs where both clusters match Disperse nodes can also be assigned the filaments between those nodes, but as the web and matching methods are varied, most such filaments do not remain. There is an enhancement of subhalo counts and halo mass between cluster pairs, averaging over cluster pairs assigned Disperse filaments increases the enhancement. The approach here also lends itself to comparing nodes across many cosmic web constructions, using the fixed underlying cluster distribution to make a correspondence.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.