Researcher profile

J. D. Cohn

J. D. Cohn contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Clusters in the Disperse cosmic web

Galaxy cluster mass halos ("clusters") in a dark matter simulation are matched to nodes in several different cosmic webs found using the Disperse cosmic web finder. The webs have different simulation smoothings and Disperse parameter choices; for each, 4 methods are considered for matching Disperse nodes to clusters. For most of the webs, Disperse nodes outnumber clusters, but not every cluster has a Disperse node match (and sometimes $>1$ cluster matches to the same Disperse node). The clusters frequently lacking a matching Disperse node have a different distribution of local shear trends and perhaps merger histories. It might be interesting to see in what other ways, e.g., observational properties, these clusters differ. For the webs with smoothing $\leq$ 2.5 $Mpc/h$, and all but the most restrictive matching criterion, $\sim$3/4 of the clusters always have a Disperse node counterpart. The nearest cluster to a given Disperse node and vice versa, within twice the smoothing length, obey a cluster mass-Disperse node density relation. Cluster pairs where both clusters match Disperse nodes can also be assigned the filaments between those nodes, but as the web and matching methods are varied, most such filaments do not remain. There is an enhancement of subhalo counts and halo mass between cluster pairs, averaging over cluster pairs assigned Disperse filaments increases the enhancement. The approach here also lends itself to comparing nodes across many cosmic web constructions, using the fixed underlying cluster distribution to make a correspondence.

preprint2019arXiv

Multiwavelength cluster mass estimates and machine learning

One emerging application of machine learning methods is the inference of galaxy cluster masses. In this note, machine learning is used to directly combine five simulated multiwavelength measurements in order to find cluster masses. This is in contrast to finding mass estimates for each observable, normally by using a scaling relation, and then combining these scaling law based mass estimates using a likelihood. We also illustrate how the contributions of each observable to the accuracy of the resulting mass measurement can be compared via model-agnostic Importance Permutation values. Thirdly, as machine learning relies upon the accuracy of the training set in capturing observables, their correlations, and the observational selection function, and as the machine learning training set originates from simulations, two tests of whether a simulation's correlations are consistent with observations are suggested and explored as well.