Paper detail

Clustering Categorical Time Series into Unknown Number of Clusters: A Perfect Simulation based Approach

Pamminger and Fruwirth-Schnatter (2010) considered a Bayesian approach to model-based clustering of categorical time series assuming a fixed number of clusters. But the popular methods for selecting the number of clusters, for example, the Bayes Information Criterion (BIC), turned out to have severe problems in the categorical time series context. In this paper, we circumvent the difficulties of choosing the number of clusters by adopting the Bayesian semiparametric mixture model approach introduced by Bhattacharya (2008), who assume that the number of clusters is a random quantity, but is bounded above by a (possibly large) number of clusters. We adopt the perfect simulation approach of Mukhopadhyay and Bhattacharya (2012) for posterior simulation for completely solving the problems of convergence of the underlying Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach. Importantly, within our main perfect simulation algorithm, there arose the necessity to simulate perfectly from the joint distribution of a set of continuous random variables with log-concave full conditional densities. We propose and develop a novel and efficient perfect simulation methodology for joint distributions with log-concave full conditionals. This perfect sampling methodology is of independent interest as well since in a very large and important class of Bayesian applications the full conditionals turn out to be log-concave. We will consider application of our model and methodology to the Austrian wage mobility data, also analysed by Pamminger and Fruwirth-Schnatter (2010), and adopting the methods developed in Mukhopadhyay et al. (2011), Mukhopadhyay et al. (2012), will obtain the posterior modes of clusterings and also the desired highest posterior distribution credible regions of the posterior distribution of clusterings.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.