Paper detail

Clustering and finite size effects in a two-species exclusion process

We study the cluster size distribution of particles for a two-species exclusion process which involves totally asymmetric transport process of two oppositely directed species with stochastic directional switching of the species on a 1D lattice. As a function of $Q$ - the ratio of the translation rate and directional switching rate of particles, in the limit of $Q \rightarrow 0$, the probability distribution of the cluster size is an exponentially decaying function of cluster size $m$ and is exactly similar to the cluster size distribution of a TASEP. For $Q>>1$, the model can be mapped to persistent exclusion process (PEP) and the average cluster size, $\langle m \rangle \propto Q^{1/2} $. We obtain an approximate expression for the average cluster size in this limit. For finite system size system of $L$ lattice sites, for a particle number density $ρ$, the probability distribution of cluster sizes exhibits a distinct peak which corresponds to the formation of a single cluster of size $m_s = ρL$. However this peak vanishes in the thermodynamic limit $ L \rightarrow \infty$. Interestingly, the probability of this largest size cluster, $P(m_s)$, exhibits scaling behaviour such that in terms of scaled variable $Q_1 \equiv Q/L^2 ρ(1-ρ)$, data collapse is observed for the probability of this cluster. The statistical features related to clustering observed for this minimal model may also be relevant for understanding clustering characteristics in {\it active } particles systems in confined 1D geometry.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.