Paper detail

Cluster folding analysis for the 6,7Li and 20Ne + 24Mg nuclear systems

The experimentally available angular distributions (ADs) for 6,7Li and 20Ne ions elastically scattered from a 24Mg target are reanalyzed using various nuclear potentials based on phenomenological and microscopic approaches. The ADs for the 6Li + 24Mg system at energies Elab = 20, 88, and 240 MeV are considered, as are the ADs for the 7Li + 24Mg system at Elab = 20, 34, and 88 MeV, and the ADs for the 20Ne + 24Mg systems at Elab = 50, 60, 80, 90, and 100 MeV. Special emphasis is placed on the (d + α) and (t + α) cluster structures of 6Li and 7Li weakly bound projectiles, which appear at relatively low energies of 1.4737 and 2.468 MeV, respectively. Furthermore, the 20Ne stable nucleus is a candidate to reveal the α + 16O cluster structure at an energy of 4.73 MeV. These systems are analyzed within the framework of the cluster folding model by taking into consideration the aforementioned cluster nature of the (6Li, 7Li, and 20Ne) projectiles. The adopted approaches fairly reproduced the experimental ADs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.