Paper detail

Cluster based RBF Kernel for Support Vector Machines

In the classical Gaussian SVM classification we use the feature space projection transforming points to normal distributions with fixed covariance matrices (identity in the standard RBF and the covariance of the whole dataset in Mahalanobis RBF). In this paper we add additional information to Gaussian SVM by considering local geometry-dependent feature space projection. We emphasize that our approach is in fact an algorithm for a construction of the new Gaussian-type kernel. We show that better (compared to standard RBF and Mahalanobis RBF) classification results are obtained in the simple case when the space is preliminary divided by k-means into two sets and points are represented as normal distributions with a covariances calculated according to the dataset partitioning. We call the constructed method C$_k$RBF, where $k$ stands for the amount of clusters used in k-means. We show empirically on nine datasets from UCI repository that C$_2$RBF increases the stability of the grid search (measured as the probability of finding good parameters).

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.