Paper detail

CLTS+: A New Chinese Long Text Summarization Dataset with Abstractive Summaries

The abstractive methods lack of creative ability is particularly a problem in automatic text summarization. The summaries generated by models are mostly extracted from the source articles. One of the main causes for this problem is the lack of dataset with abstractiveness, especially for Chinese. In order to solve this problem, we paraphrase the reference summaries in CLTS, the Chinese Long Text Summarization dataset, correct errors of factual inconsistencies, and propose the first Chinese Long Text Summarization dataset with a high level of abstractiveness, CLTS+, which contains more than 180K article-summary pairs and is available online. Additionally, we introduce an intrinsic metric based on co-occurrence words to evaluate the dataset we constructed. We analyze the extraction strategies used in CLTS+ summaries against other datasets to quantify the abstractiveness and difficulty of our new data and train several baselines on CLTS+ to verify the utility of it for improving the creative ability of models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.