Paper detail

Classifying decomposition and wavelet coorbit spaces using coarse geometry

This paper is concerned with the study of Besov-type decomposition spaces, which are scales of spaces associated to suitably defined coverings of the euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^d$, or suitable open subsets thereof. A fundamental problem in this domain, that is currently not well understood, is deciding when two different coverings give rise to the same scale of decomposition spaces. In this paper, we establish a coarse geometric approach to this problem, and show how it specializes for the case of wavelet coorbit spaces associated to a particular class of matrix groups $H < GL(\mathbb{R}^d)$ acting via dilations. This class can be understood as a special case of decomposition spaces, and it turns out that the question whether two different dilation groups $H_1,H_2$ have the same coorbit spaces can be decided by investigating whether a suitably defined map $ϕ: H_1 \to H_2$ is a quasi-isometry with respect to suitably defined word metrics. We then proceed to apply this criterion to a large class of dilation groups called {\em shearlet dilation groups}, where this quasi-isometry condition can be characterized algebraically. We close with the discussion of selected examples.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.