Paper detail

Classification of P-oligomorphic groups, conjectures of Cameron and Macpherson

Let G be a group of permutations of a denumerable set E. The profile of G is the function phi which counts, for each n, the number phi(n) of orbits of G acting on the n-subsets of E. Counting functions arising this way, and their associated generating series, form a rich yet apparently strongly constrained class. In particular, Cameron conjectured in the late seventies that, whenever the profile phi(n) is bounded by a polynomial -- we say that G is P-oligomorphic --, it is asymptotically equivalent to a polynomial. In 1985, Macpherson further asked whether the orbit algebra of G -- a graded commutative algebra invented by Cameron and whose Hilbert function is phi -- is finitely generated. In this paper we establish a classification of (closed) P-oligomorphic permutation groups in terms of finite permutation groups with decorated blocks. It follows from the classification that the orbit algebra of any P-oligomorphic group is isomorphic to (a straightforward quotient of) the invariant ring of some finite permutation group. This answers positively both Cameron's conjecture and Macpherson's question. The orbit algebra is in fact Cohen-Macaulay; therefore the generating series of phi is a rational fraction whose numerator has positive coefficients, while the denominator admits a combinatorial description. In addition, the classification provides a finite data structure for encoding closed P-oligomorphic groups. This paves the way for computing with them and enumerating them as well as for proofs by structural induction. Finally, the relative simplicity of the classification gives hopes to extend the study to, e.g., the class of (closed) permutations groups with sub-exponential profile. The proof exploits classical notions from group theory -- notably block systems and their lattice properties --, commutative algebra, and invariant theory.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.