Paper detail

Classification of New X-ray Counterparts for Fermi Unassociated Gamma Ray Sources Using the Swift X-Ray Telescope

Approximately one-third of the gamma-ray sources in the third Fermi-LAT catalog are unidentified or unassociated with objects at other wavelengths. Observations with Swift-XRT have yielded possible counterparts in $\sim$30% of these source regions. The objective of this work is to identify the nature of these possible counterparts, utilizing their gamma ray properties coupled with the Swift derived X-ray properties. The majority of the known sources in the Fermi catalogs are blazars, which constitute the bulk of the extragalactic gamma-ray source population. The galactic population on the other hand is dominated by pulsars. Blazars and pulsars occupy different parameter space when X-ray fluxes are compared with various gamma-ray properties. In this work, we utilize the X-ray observations performed with the Swift-XRT for the unknown Fermi sources and compare their X-ray and gamma-ray properties to differentiate between the two source classes. We employ two machine learning algorithms, decision tree and random forest classifier, to our high signal-to-noise ratio sample of 217 sources, each of which correspond to Fermi unassociated regions. The accuracy score for both methods were found to be 97% and 99%, respectively. The random forest classifier, which is based on the application of a multitude of decision trees, associated a probability value (P$_{bzr}$) for each source to be a blazar. This yielded 173 blazar candidates with P$_{bzr}$ $\geq$ 90% for each of these sources, and 134 of these possible blazar source associations had P$_{bzr}$ $\geq$ 99%. The results yielded 13 sources with P$_{bzr}$ $\leq$ 10%, which we deemed as reasonable candidates for pulsars, 7 of which result with P$_{bzr}$ $\leq$ 1%. There were 31 sources that exhibited intermediate probabilities and were termed ambiguous due to their unclear characterization as a pulsar or a blazar.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.