Researcher profile

Abraham D Falcone

Abraham D Falcone contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Classification of New X-ray Counterparts for Fermi Unassociated Gamma Ray Sources Using the Swift X-Ray Telescope

Approximately one-third of the gamma-ray sources in the third Fermi-LAT catalog are unidentified or unassociated with objects at other wavelengths. Observations with Swift-XRT have yielded possible counterparts in $\sim$30% of these source regions. The objective of this work is to identify the nature of these possible counterparts, utilizing their gamma ray properties coupled with the Swift derived X-ray properties. The majority of the known sources in the Fermi catalogs are blazars, which constitute the bulk of the extragalactic gamma-ray source population. The galactic population on the other hand is dominated by pulsars. Blazars and pulsars occupy different parameter space when X-ray fluxes are compared with various gamma-ray properties. In this work, we utilize the X-ray observations performed with the Swift-XRT for the unknown Fermi sources and compare their X-ray and gamma-ray properties to differentiate between the two source classes. We employ two machine learning algorithms, decision tree and random forest classifier, to our high signal-to-noise ratio sample of 217 sources, each of which correspond to Fermi unassociated regions. The accuracy score for both methods were found to be 97% and 99%, respectively. The random forest classifier, which is based on the application of a multitude of decision trees, associated a probability value (P$_{bzr}$) for each source to be a blazar. This yielded 173 blazar candidates with P$_{bzr}$ $\geq$ 90% for each of these sources, and 134 of these possible blazar source associations had P$_{bzr}$ $\geq$ 99%. The results yielded 13 sources with P$_{bzr}$ $\leq$ 10%, which we deemed as reasonable candidates for pulsars, 7 of which result with P$_{bzr}$ $\leq$ 1%. There were 31 sources that exhibited intermediate probabilities and were termed ambiguous due to their unclear characterization as a pulsar or a blazar.