Paper detail

Classification of load forecasting studies by forecasting problem to select load forecasting techniques and methodologies

The key contribution of this paper is to propose a classification into two dimensions of the load forecasting studies to decide which forecasting tools to use in which case. This classification aims to provide a synthetic view of the relevant forecasting techniques and methodologies by forecasting problem. In addition, the key principles of the main techniques and methodologies used are summarized along with the reviews of these papers. The classification process relies on two couples of parameters that define a forecasting problem. Each article is classified with key information about the dataset used and the forecasting tools implemented: the forecasting techniques (probabilistic or deterministic) and methodologies, the data cleansing techniques, and the error metrics. The process to select the articles reviewed in this paper was conducted into two steps. First, a set of load forecasting studies was built based on relevant load forecasting reviews and forecasting competitions. The second step consisted in selecting the most relevant studies of this set based on the following criteria: the quality of the description of the forecasting techniques and methodologies implemented, the description of the results, and the contributions. This paper can be read in two passes. The first one by identifying the forecasting problem of interest to select the corresponding class into one of the four classification tables. Each one references all the articles classified across a forecasting horizon. They provide a synthetic view of the forecasting tools used by articles addressing similar forecasting problems. Then, a second level composed of four Tables summarizes key information about the forecasting tools and the results of these studies. The second pass consists in reading the key principles of the main techniques and methodologies of interest and the reviews of the articles.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.