Paper detail

Classification of Lie point symmetries for quadratic Li$\acute{\textbf{e}}$nard type equation $\ddot{x}+f(x)\dot{x}^2+g(x)=0$

In this paper we carry out a complete classification of the Lie point symmetry groups associated with the quadratic Li$\acute{e}$nard type equation, $\ddot {x} + f(x){\dot {x}}^{2} + g(x)= 0$, where $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ are arbitrary functions of $x$. The symmetry analysis gets divided into two cases, $(i)$ the maximal (eight parameter) symmetry group and $(ii)$ non-maximal (three, two and one parameter) symmetry groups. We identify the most general form of the quadratic Li$\acute{e}$nard equation in each of these cases. In the case of eight parameter symmetry group, the identified general equation becomes linearizable as well as isochronic. We present specific examples of physical interest. For the nonmaximal cases, the identified equations are all integrable and include several physically interesting examples such as the Mathews-Lakshmanan oscillator, particle on a rotating parabolic well, etc. We also analyse the underlying equivalence transformations.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.