Paper detail

Class of consistent fundamental-measure free energies for hard-sphere mixtures

In fundamental-measure theories the bulk excess free-energy density of a hard-sphere fluid mixture is assumed to depend on the partial number densities ${ρ_i}$ only through the four scaled-particle-theory variables ${ξ_α}$, i.e., $Φ({ρ_i})\toΦ({ξ_α})$. By imposing consistency conditions, it is proven here that such a dependence must necessarily have the form $Φ({ξ_α})=-ξ_0\ln(1-ξ_3)+Ψ(y)ξ_1ξ_2/(1-ξ_3)$, where $y\equiv {ξ_2^2}/{12πξ_1 (1-ξ_3)}$ is a scaled variable and $Ψ(y)$ is an arbitrary dimensionless scaling function which can be determined from the free-energy density of the one-component system. Extension to the inhomogeneous case is achieved by standard replacements of the variables ${ξ_α}$ by the fundamental-measure (scalar, vector, and tensor) weighted densities ${n_α(\mathbf{r})}$. Comparison with computer simulations shows the superiority of this bulk free energy over the White Bear one.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.