Paper detail

Circumstellar disks in binary star systems

In this paper we study the evolution of viscous and radiative circumstellar disks under the influence of a companion star. We focus on the eccentric γ Cephei and α Centauri system as examples and compare the disk quantities such as disk eccentricity and precession rate to previous isothermal simulations. We perform two-dimensional hydrodynamical simulations of the binary star systems under the assumption of coplanarity of the disk, host star and binary companion. We use the grid-based, staggered mesh code FARGO with an additional energy equation to which we added radiative cooling based on opacity tables. The eccentric binary companion perturbs the disk around the primary star periodically. Upon passing periastron spirals arms are induced that wind from the outer disk towards the star. In isothermal simulations this results in disk eccentricities up to ε_disk ~ 0.2, but in more realistic radiative models we obtain much smaller eccentricities of about ε_disk ~ 0.04 - 0.06 with no real precession. Models with varying viscosity and disk mass indicate show that disks with less mass have lower temperatures and higher disk eccentricity. The rather large high disk eccentricities, as indicated in previous isothermal disk simulations, implied a more difficult planet formation in the γ Cephei system due to the enhanced collision velocities of planetesimals. We have shown that under more realistic conditions with radiative cooling the disk become less eccentric and thus planet formation may be made easier. However, we estimate that the viscosity in the disk has to very small, with α \lesssim 0.001, because otherwise the disk's lifetime will be too short to allow planet formation to occur along the core instability scenario. We estimate that the periodic heating of the disk in eccentric binaries will be observable in the mid-IR regime.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.