Paper detail

CinC-GAN for Effective F0 prediction for Whisper-to-Normal Speech Conversion

Recently, Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN)-based methods have shown remarkable performance for the Voice Conversion and WHiSPer-to-normal SPeeCH (WHSP2SPCH) conversion. One of the key challenges in WHSP2SPCH conversion is the prediction of fundamental frequency (F0). Recently, authors have proposed state-of-the-art method Cycle-Consistent Generative Adversarial Networks (CycleGAN) for WHSP2SPCH conversion. The CycleGAN-based method uses two different models, one for Mel Cepstral Coefficients (MCC) mapping, and another for F0 prediction, where F0 is highly dependent on the pre-trained model of MCC mapping. This leads to additional non-linear noise in predicted F0. To suppress this noise, we propose Cycle-in-Cycle GAN (i.e., CinC-GAN). It is specially designed to increase the effectiveness in F0 prediction without losing the accuracy of MCC mapping. We evaluated the proposed method on a non-parallel setting and analyzed on speaker-specific, and gender-specific tasks. The objective and subjective tests show that CinC-GAN significantly outperforms the CycleGAN. In addition, we analyze the CycleGAN and CinC-GAN for unseen speakers and the results show the clear superiority of CinC-GAN.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.