Paper detail

Choosing a sampling frequency for ECG QRS detection using convolutional networks

Automated QRS detection methods depend on the ECG data which is sampled at a certain frequency, irrespective of filter-based traditional methods or convolutional network (CNN) based deep learning methods. These methods require a selection of the sampling frequency at which they operate in the very first place. While working with data from two different datasets, which are sampled at different frequencies, often, data from both the datasets may need to resample at a common target frequency, which may be the frequency of either of the datasets or could be a different one. However, choosing data sampled at a certain frequency may have an impact on the model's generalisation capacity, and complexity. There exist some studies that investigate the effects of ECG sample frequencies on traditional filter-based methods, however, an extensive study of the effect of ECG sample frequency on deep learning-based models (convolutional networks), exploring their generalisability and complexity is yet to be explored. This experimental research investigates the impact of six different sample frequencies (50, 100, 250, 500, 1000, and 2000Hz) on four different convolutional network-based models' generalisability and complexity in order to form a basis to decide on an appropriate sample frequency for the QRS detection task for a particular performance requirement. Intra-database tests report an accuracy improvement no more than approximately 0.6\% from 100Hz to 250Hz and the shorter interquartile range for those two frequencies for all CNN-based models. The findings reveal that convolutional network-based deep learning models are capable of scoring higher levels of detection accuracies on ECG signals sampled at frequencies as low as 100Hz or 250Hz while maintaining lower model complexity (number of trainable parameters and training time).

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.