Paper detail

Cheeger Bounds for Stable Phase Retrieval in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces

Phase retrieval seeks to reconstruct a signal from phaseless intensity measurements and, in applications where measurements contain errors, demands stable reconstruction. We study local stability of phase retrieval in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces. Motivated by Grohs-Rathmair's Cheeger-type estimate for Gabor phase retrieval, we introduce a kernel Cheeger constant that quantifies connectedness relative to kernel localization. This notion yields a clean stability certificate: we establish a unified lower bound over both real and complex fields, and in the real case also an upper bound, each in terms of the reciprocal kernel Cheeger constant. Our framework treats finite- and infinite-dimensional settings uniformly and covers discrete, semi-discrete, and continuous measurement domains. For generalized wavelet phase retrieval from (semi-)discrete frames, we bound the kernel Cheeger constant by the Cheeger constant of a data-dependent weighted graph. We further characterize phase retrievability for generalized wavelet transforms and derive a simple sufficient criterion for wavelet sign retrieval in arbitrary dimension for transforms associated with irreducibly admissible matrix groups.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.