Paper detail

Checkpointing SPAdes for Metagenome Assembly: Transparency versus Performance in Production

The SPAdes assembler for metagenome assembly is a long-running application commonly used at the NERSC supercomputing site. However, NERSC, like many other sites, has a 48-hour limit on resource allocations. The solution is to chain together multiple resource allocations in a single run, using checkpoint-restart. This case study provides insights into the "pain points" in applying a well-known checkpointing package (DMTCP: Distributed MultiThreaded CheckPointing) to long-running production workloads of SPAdes. This work has exposed several bugs and limitations of DMTCP, which were fixed to support the large memory and fragmented intermediate files of SPAdes. But perhaps more interesting for other applications, this work reveals a tension between the transparency goals of DMTCP and performance concerns due to an I/O bottleneck during the checkpointing process when supporting large memory and many files. Suggestions are made for overcoming this I/O bottleneck, which provides important "lessons learned" for similar applications.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.