Paper detail

Charmless Hadronic Two-body Decays of the B_s Mesons

Two-body charmless nonleptonic decays of the B_s meson are studied within the framework of generalized factorization in which factorization is applied to the tree level matrix elements while the effective Wilson coefficients are $μ$ and renormalization scheme independent, and nonfactorizable effects are parametrized in terms of N_c(LL) and N_c(LR), the effective numbers of colors arising from (V-A)(V-A) and (V-A)(V+A) four-quark operators, respectively. Branching ratios of $B_s\to PP,PV,VV$ decays are calculated as a function of N_c(LR) with two different considerations for N_c(LL). We find that (i) the electroweak penguin contributions account for about 85% (for N_c(LL)=2) of the decay rates of $B_s\to ηπ,η'π,ηρ,η'ρ,ϕπ,ϕρ$, which receive contributions only from tree and electroweak penguin diagrams; a measurement of them will provide a clean determination of the electroweak penguin coefficient a_9, (ii) electroweak penguin corrections to $B_s\toω\etapp,ϕη,ωϕ,K^{(*)}ϕ,ϕϕ$ are in general as significant as QCD penguin effects and even play a dominant role; their decay rates depend strongly on N_c(LR), (iii) the branching ratio of $B_s\to ηη'$ is of order 2x10^{-5}, (iv) the contribution from the $η'$ charm content is important for $B_s\toη'η'$, but less significant for $B_s\toηη'$, and (v) the decay rates for the final states $K^{+(*)}K^{-(*)}$ follow the pattern: $Γ(B_s\to K^+K^-)>Γ(B_s\to K^+K^{*-})\geqΓ(B_s\to K^{*+}K^{*-}) >Γ(B_s\to K^{+*}K^-)$, as a consequence of various interference effects between the penguin amplitudes governed by the coefficients a_4 and a_6.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.