Paper detail

Charmless hadronic $B_c \to VA, AA$ decays in the perturbative QCD approach

In this work, we calculate the branching ratios (BRs) and the polarization fractions of sixty two charmless two-body $B_c$ meson decays into final states involving one vector and one axial-vector meson ($VA$) or two axial-vector mesons($AA$) within the framework of perturbative QCD (pQCD) approach systematically, where $A$ is either a $^3P_1$ or $^1P_1$ axial-vector meson. All considered decay channels can only occur through the annihilation topologies in the standard model. Based on the perturbative calculations and phenomenological analysis, we find the following results: (i) the CP-averaged BRs of the considered sixty two $B_c$ decays are in the range of $10^{-5}$ to $10^{-9}$; (ii) since the behavior for $^1P_1$ meson is much different from that of $^3P_1$ meson, the BRs of $B_c \to A(^1P_1) (V, A(^1P_1))$ decays are generally larger than that of $B_c \to A(^3P_1) (V, A(^3P_1))$ decays in the pQCD approach; (iii) many considered decays modes, such as $B_c\to a_1(1260)^+ ω$, $b_1(1235) ρ$, etc, have sizable BRs within the reach of the LHCb experiments; (iv) the longitudinal polarization fractions of most considered decays are large and play the dominant role; (v) the pQCD predictions for several decays involving mixtures of $^3P_1$ and/or $^1P_1$ mesons are highly sensitive to the values of the mixing angles, which will be tested by the ongoing LHC and forthcoming Super-B experiments; (vi) the CP-violating asymmetries of these considered $B_c$ decays are absent in the standard model because only one type tree operator is involved.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.