Paper detail

Charm and beauty isolation from heavy flavor decay electrons in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV at LHC

We present an analysis on the heavy flavor hadron decay electrons with charm and beauty contributions decomposed via a data driven method in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV at LHC. The transverse momentum $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ spectra, nuclear modification factor $R_{\mathrm{AA}}$ and azimuthal anisotropic flow $v_2$ distributions of electrons from charm and beauty decays are obtained. We find that the electron $R_{\mathrm{AA}}$ from charm ($R_{\mathrm{AA}}^{\mathrm{c\rightarrow e}}$) and beauty ($R_{\mathrm{AA}}^{\mathrm{b\rightarrow e}}$) decays are suppressed at $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ $>$ 2.0 and $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ $>$ 3.0 GeV/$c$ in Pb+Pb collisions, respectively, which indicates that charm and beauty interact with and lose their energy in the hot-dense medium. A less suppression of electron $R_{\mathrm{AA}}$ from beauty decays than that from charm decays at 2.0 $<$ $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ $<$ 8.0 GeV/$c$ is observed, which is consistent with the mass-dependent partonic energy loss scenario. A non-zero electron $v_2$ from beauty decays ($v_{2}^{\mathrm{b\rightarrow e}}$) is observed and in good agreement with ALICE measurement. At low $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ region from 1.0 to 3.0 GeV/$c$, a discrepancy between RHIC and LHC results is observed with 68\% confidence level, which suggests different degree of thermalization of beauty quark under different temperatures of the medium. At 3.0 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ $<$ 7.0 GeV/$c$, $v_{2}^{\mathrm{b\rightarrow e}}$ deviates from a number-of-constituent-quark (NCQ) scaling hypothesis, which favors that beauty quark is unlikely thermalized in heavy-ion collisions at LHC energy.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.