Paper detail

Characterizing Urban Lifestyle Signatures Using Motif Properties in Network of Places

The lifestyles of urban dwellers could reveal important insights regarding the dynamics and complexity of cities. Despite growing research on analysis of lifestyle patterns in cities, little is known about the characteristics of people's lifestyles patterns at urban scale. This limitation is primarily due to challenges in characterizing lifestyle patterns when human movement data is aggregated to protect the privacy of users. In this study, we model cities based on aggregated human visitation data to construct a network of places. We then examine the subgraph signatures in the networks of places to map and characterize lifestyle patterns at city scale. Location-based data from Harris County, Dallas County, New York County, and Broward County in the United States were examined to reveal lifestyle signatures in cities. For the motif analysis, two-node, three-node, and four-node motifs without location attributes were extracted from human visitation networks. Second, homogenized nodes in motifs were encoded with location categories from NAICS codes. Multiple statistical measures, including network metrics and motif properties, were quantified to characterize lifestyle signatures. The results show that: people's lifestyles in urban environments can be well depicted and quantified based on distribution and attributes of motifs in networks of places; motifs in networks of places show stability in quantity and distance as well as periodicity on weekends and weekdays indicating the stability of lifestyle patterns in cities; human visitation networks and lifestyle patterns show similarities across different metropolitan areas implying the universality of lifestyle signatures across cities. The findings provide deeper insights into urban lifestyles signatures in urban studies and provide important insights for data-informed urban planning and management.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.