Paper detail

Characterizing the Hyperuniformity of Ordered and Disordered Two-Phase Media

The hyperuniformity concept provides a unified means to classify all perfect crystals, perfect quasicrystals, and exotic amorphous states of matter according to their capacity to suppress large-scale density fluctuations. While the classification of hyperuniform point configurations has received considerable attention, much less is known about the classification of hyperuniform heterogeneous two-phase media, which include composites, porous media, foams, cellular solids, colloidal suspensions and polymer blends. The purpose of this article is to begin such a program for certain two-dimensional models of hyperuniform two-phase media by ascertaining their local volume-fraction variances $σ^2_{_V}(R)$ and the associated hyperuniformity order metrics $\overline{B}_V$. This is a highly challenging task because the geometries and topologies of the phases are generally much richer and more complex than point-configuration arrangements and one must ascertain a broadly applicable length scale to make key quantities dimensionless. Therefore, we focus on a certain class of two-dimensional periodic cellular networks, periodic and disordered/irregular packings, some of which maximize their effective transport and elastic properties. Among the cellular networks considered, the honeycomb networks have a minimal value of $\overline{B}_V$ across all volume fractions. On the other hand, among all packings considered, the triangular-lattice packings have the smallest values of $\overline{B}_V$ for the possible range of volume fractions. Among all structures studied here, the triangular-lattice packing has the minimal order metric for almost all volume fractions. Our study provides a theoretical foundation for the establishment of hyperuniformity order metrics for general two-phase media and a basis to discover new hyperuniform two-phase systems by inverse design procedures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.