Paper detail

Characterizing and Adapting the Consistency-Latency Tradeoff in Distributed Key-value Stores

The CAP theorem is a fundamental result that applies to distributed storage systems. In this paper, we first present and prove two CAP-like impossibility theorems. To state these theorems, we present probabilistic models to characterize the three important elements of the CAP theorem: consistency (C), availability or latency (A), and partition tolerance (P). The theorems show the un-achievable envelope, i.e., which combinations of the parameters of the three models make them impossible to achieve together. Next, we present the design of a class of systems called PCAP that perform close to the envelope described by our theorems. In addition, these systems allow applications running on a single data-center to specify either a latency SLA or a consistency SLA. The PCAP systems automatically adapt, in real-time and under changing network conditions, to meet the SLA while optimizing the other C/A metric. We incorporate PCAP into two popular key-value stores -- Apache Cassandra and Riak. Our experiments with these two deployments, under realistic workloads, reveal that the PCAP system satisfactorily meets SLAs, and performs close to the achievable envelope. We also extend PCAP from a single data-center to multiple geo-distributed data-centers.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.