Paper detail

Characterization of the $^{12}$C(p,p')$^{12}$C Reaction (E$_p$=19.5$-$30 MeV) for Active Interrogation

Passive detection of special nuclear material (SNM) is challenging due to its inherently low rate of spontaneous emission of penetrating radiation, the relative ease of shielding, and the fluctuating and frequently overwhelming background. Active interrogation (AI), the use of external radiation to increase the emission rate of characteristic radiation from SNM, has long been considered to be a promising method to overcome those challenges. Current AI systems that incorporate radiography tend to use bremsstrahlung beams, which can deliver high radiation doses. Low-energy ion-driven nuclear reactions that produce multiple monoenergetic photons may be used as an alternative. The $^{12}$C(p,p')$^{12}$C is one such reaction that could produce large gamma-ray yields of highly penetrating 4.4- and 15.1-MeV gamma rays. This reaction does not directly produce neutrons below the $\sim$19.7-MeV threshold, and the 15.1-MeV gamma-ray line is well matched to the photofission cross-section of $^{235}$U and $^{238}$U. We report the measurements of thick-target gamma-ray yields at 4.4 and 15.1 MeV from the $^{12}$C(p,p')$^{12}$C at proton energies of 19.5, 25, and 30 MeV. Measurements were made with two 3'' EJ309 cylindrical liquid scintillation detectors and thermoluminescent dosimeters placed at 0 and 90 degrees. We estimate the highest yields of the 4.4- and 15.1-MeV gamma rays of 1.65$\times10^{10}$ sr$^{-1}μ$ C$^{-1}$ and 4.47$\times10^8$ sr$^{-1}μ$ C$^{-1}$ at a proton energy of 30 MeV, respectively. The yield of 4.4 and 15.1 MeV gamma rays in all experimental configurations is greater than a comparable deuteron-driven reaction that produces the same gamma-ray energies- $^{11}$B(d,n$γ$)$^{12}$C. However, a two orders of magnitude increase of the neutron radiation dose is observed when the proton energy increases from 19.5 to 30 MeV.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.