Paper detail

Characteristic times of biased random walks on complex networks

We consider degree-biased random walkers whose probability to move from a node to one of its neighbors of degree $k$ is proportional to $k^α$, where $α$ is a tuning parameter. We study both numerically and analytically three types of characteristic times, namely: i) the time the walker needs to come back to the starting node, ii) the time it takes to visit a given node for the first time, and iii) the time it takes to visit all the nodes of the network. We consider a large data set of real-world networks and we show that the value of $α$ which minimizes the three characteristic times is different from the value $α_{\rm min}=-1$ analytically found for uncorrelated networks in the mean-field approximation. In addition to this, we found that assortative networks have preferentially a value of $α_{\rm min}$ in the range $[-1,-0.5]$, while disassortative networks have $α_{\rm min}$ in the range $[-0.5, 0]$. We derive an analytical relation between the degree correlation exponent $ν$ and the optimal bias value $α_{\rm min}$, which works well for real-world assortative networks. When only local information is available, degree-biased random walks can guarantee smaller characteristic times than the classical unbiased random walks, by means of an appropriate tuning of the motion bias.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.