Paper detail

Characterising heavy-tailed networks using q-generalised entropy and q-adjacency kernels

Heavy-tailed networks, which have degree distributions characterised by slower than exponentially bounded tails, are common in many different situations. Some interesting cases, where heavy tails are characterised by inverse powers $λ$ in the range $1<λ<2,$ arise for associative knowledge networks, and semantic and linguistic networks. In these cases, the differences between the networks are often delicate, calling for robust methods to characterise the differences. Here, we introduce a method for comparing networks using a density matrix based on q-generalised adjacency matrix kernels. It is shown that comparison of networks can then be performed using the q-generalised Kullback-Leibler divergence. In addition, the q-generalised divergence can be interpreted as a q-generalised free energy, which enables the thermodynamic-like macroscopic description of the heavy-tailed networks. The viability of the q-generalised adjacency kernels and the thermodynamic-like description in characterisation of complex networks is demonstrated using a simulated set of networks, which are modular and heavy-tailed with a degree distribution of inverse power law in the range $1<λ<2$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.