Paper detail

Character correspondences induced by magic representations

Let G be a finite group, K a normal subgroup of G and H a subgroup such that G = HK, and set L = H \cap K. Suppose θ\in Irr K and ϕ\in Irr L, and ϕ occurs in θ_L with multiplicity n > 0. A projective representation of degree n on H/L is defined in this situation; if this representation is ordinary, it yields a bijection between Irr(G | θ) and Irr(H | ϕ). The behavior of fields of values and Schur indices under this bijection is described. A modular version of the main result is proved. We show that the theory applies if n and the order of H/L are coprime. Finally, assume that P <= G is a p-group with P \cap K = 1 and PK normal in G, that H = N_G(P), and that θ and ϕ belong to blocks of p-defect zero which are Brauer correspondents with respect to the group P. Then every block of F_p[G] or Q_p[G] lying over θ is Morita-equivalent to its Brauer correspondent with respect to P. This strengthens a result of Turull [Above the Glauberman correspondence, Advances in Math. 217 (2008), 2170--2205].

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.