Paper detail

Chaotic Interference and Quantum-Classical Correspondence: Mechanisms of Decoherence and State Mixing

The famous Nils Bohr's quantum-classical correspondence principle states that the classical mechanics is a limiting case of the more general quantum mechanics. This implies that ``under certain conditions" quantum laws of motion become equivalent to classical laws. One of the conditions is fairly obvious: the corresponding classical action should be very large as compared with the Planck's constant. But this condition is not sufficient. Suppression of effects of quantum interference ("decoherence") is the phenomenon of primary importance for understanding of the Bohr's principle. Being, in essence, of quite general nature, this problem takes on special significance in the case of non-linear classically chaotic quantum systems. Whereas the rapid decay of phase correlations is an underlying feature of the classical dynamical chaos, the "quantum chaos" by itself is not capable of destroying the quantum phase coherence. Strictly speaking, any initially pure quantum state remains pure during an arbitrary long unitary evolution. Basically, formation of incoherent mixed states (decoherence) results only from the process of preparation of a mixed initial state or interaction with a noisy environment. Just the decoherence brigdes the quantum and classical worlds. Peculiarities of the time behavior of Peres fidelity, state purity, Shanon and von Neumann entropies are analyzed in detail. We demonstrate the ways the decoherence shows up in periodically driven systems that can be associated with Ramsey-type interferomentry experiments with ion traps. Finally, decoherence in ballistic electron quantum transport caused by interaction with a disordered environment is considered.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.