Paper detail

Channel Models for Multi-Level Cell Flash Memories Based on Empirical Error Analysis

We propose binary discrete parametric channel models for multi-level cell (MLC) flash memories that provide accurate ECC performance estimation by modeling the empirically observed error characteristics under program/erase (P/E) cycling stress. Through a detailed empirical error characterization of 1X-nm and 2Y-nm MLC flash memory chips from two different vendors, we observe and characterize the overdispersion phenomenon in the number of bit errors per ECC frame. A well studied channel model such as the binary asymmetric channel (BAC) model is unable to provide accurate ECC performance estimation. Hence we propose a channel model based on the beta-binomial probability distribution (2-BBM channel model) which is a good fit for the overdispersed empirical error characteristics and show through statistical tests and simulation results for BCH, LDPC and polar codes, that the 2-BBM channel model provides accurate ECC performance estimation in MLC flash memories.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.