Paper detail

Change in the mean in the domain of attraction of the normal law via Darling-Erdős theorems

This paper studies the problem of testing the null assumption of no-change in the mean of chronologically ordered independent observations on a random variable $X$ {\it versus} the at most one change in the mean alternative hypothesis. The approach taken is via a Darling-Erdős type self-normalized maximal deviation between sample means before and sample means after possible times of a change in the expected values of the observations of a random sample. Asymptotically, the thus formulated maximal deviations are shown to have a standard Gumbel distribution under the null assumption of no change in the mean. A first such result is proved under the condition that $EX^2\log\log (|X|+1)<\infty$, while in the case of a second one, $X$ is assumed to be in a specific class of the domain of attraction of the normal law, possibly with infinite variance.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.